_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
Email this article Membandingkan Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Tipe Jigsaw dan Tipe Diskusi Panel untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Mempelajari Kimia Organik
Abstract
The aim of this study is to find out the effectiveness differences of jigsaw cooperative learning model compare with panel discussion to increase student’s academic achievement in organic chemistry learning. The effectiveness was determined by learning achievement in organic chemistry. The research design was quasi experiment with nonequivalent pretest-posttest. Statistical analysis by Anova shows that there are significant differences between learning methods to increased academic achievement. No significant differences between learning sources, also between interactions. One tail t-test show that, in this study, panel discussion learning is better than jigsaw learning to increase student’s learning achievement in organic chemistry reactions.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar pada mahasiswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe diskusi panel dalam mempelajari reaksi kimia organik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif eksperimen semu (quasi experiment) dengan model prates-pascates kelompok-kelompok tak setara. Analisis Variansi dua jalur menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan yang nyata di antara kedua metode pembelajatan yang digunakan, sedangkan kedua sumber belajar tidak menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang nyata. Dari uji-t satu ekor terlihat bahwa untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa dalam mempelajari reaksi-reaksi kimia organik pembelajaran tipe diskusi panel lebih efektif daripada tipe jigsaw.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aronson, E. (2002). Building empathy, compassion, and achievement in the jigsaw classroom. In Improving academic achievement (pp. 209–225). Elsevier.
Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ghazali, A. S. (2009). Menerapkan Paradigma Konstruktivisme melalui Strategi Belajar Kooperatif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 9(2).
Herron, J. D., & Nurrenbern, S. C. (1999). Chemical education research: Improving chemistry learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(10), 1353.
Hill, S., & Hill, T. (1993). The Cooperative Classroom (A guide to Cooperative Learning) Australia. Eleanor Curtain publishing.
Ibnu, S., Mukhadis, A., & Dasna, I. W. (2003). Dasar-dasar metodologi Penelitian. Malang.
Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2009). Methods For Teaching Metode-metode Pengajaran Meningkatkan belajar siswa TK-SMA. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kilic, D. (2008). The effect of the Jigsaw technique on learning the concepts of the principles and methods of teaching. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(1), 109–114.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Heinle Publishers.
Paulson, D. R. (1999). Active learning and cooperative learning in the organic chemistry lecture class. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(8), 1136.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform in education. Éducation et Didactique, 2(2), 149–157.
Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. The Vygotsky Reader, 338–354.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v2i2.34
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Sigit Hadiantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Belantika Pendidikan Jendela Pendidikan Indonesia Kayon Media
|
