_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
Email this article Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran (Kooperatif Model STAD dan Konvensional) terhadap Perolehan Belajar IPA Fisika Siswa Kelas IX yang Memiliki Tingkat Perkembangan Kognitif yang Berbeda
Abstract
The purpose of the studies are to examine significance of the difference in learning outcomes between students group treats by implementation of cooperative learning strategies and conventional learning strategies learning in science physics. In order to obtain the above purpose, quasi experiment was applied to students. The factorial 2x4 with non-equivalent control group design was employed to test mean scores. Based on the data analysis, the findings there was a significant difference on students learning outcome in physics between the class treated by cooperative learning strategies STAD and conventional strategies.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji signifikansi perbedaan hasil belajar IPA Fisika antara kelompok belajar yang diberi perlakuan dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif model STAD dan strategi pembelajaran konvensional. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut, dilakukan penelitian kuasi eksperimen pada siswa. Eksperimen menggunakan rancangan factorial 2 x 4 dengan versi disain faktorial non equivalen control group. Berdasarkan analisis data ditemukan ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada perolehan belajar IPA fisika antara kelas yang diberi perlakuan dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif dengan model STAD dan kelas yang diberi perlakuan dengan strategi pembelajaran konvensional.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ardhana, W. (1983). Kesanggupan Berpikir Formal ala Piaget dan Kemajuan Belajar di Sekolah. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Fakultas Pascasarjana IKIP Malang.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach Ninth Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Co.
Bent, H. A. (1984). Uses (and abuses) of models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(9), 774.
Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsepsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Bunce, D. M. (2001). Does Piaget still have anything to say to chemists? ACS Publications.
Carin, A. A., & Sund, R. B. (1975). Teaching Science trough Discovery (3rd ed.). Ohio: C. E. Merrill Pub. Co.
Cooper, J. (1990). Cooperative learning and college teaching: Tips from the trenches. Teaching Professor, 4(5), 1–2.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Springer.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ & Columbus, OH: Pearson.
Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1993). Approaches to Studying and Preferences for Teaching in Higher Education: Implications for Student Ratings.
Gardner, H. (2011). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. Basic Books (AZ).
Hill, S., & Hill, T. (1993). The Cooperative Classroom (A guide to Cooperative Learning) Australia. Eleanor Curtain publishing.
Howe, A. C., & Jones, L. (1993). Engaging children in science. Prentice Hall.
Jacob, E. (1999). Cooperative learning in context: An educational innovation in everyday classrooms. Suny Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 444.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 27–30.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26–35.
Joyce, B., Marsha, W., & Emily, C. (2009). 8th edition Model of Teaching. Pearson Education, Inc.
Lyle, K. S., & Robinson, W. R. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. ACS Publications.
Marzano, R. J., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. (2000). What Works in Classroom Instruction.
Masjkur, K. (1996). Penerapan strategi konflik kognitif untuk meluruskan salah konsep dalam belajar fisika. Proceedings Hasil Diseminasi Penelitian PMIPA. Jakarta: PPTA. Diten Dikti. Depdikbud.
Nachtigall, D. K. (1998). Preconceptions and misconceptions. Makalah.
Nurrenbern, S. C. (2001). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1107–1111.
Panitz, T. (1999). The motivational benefits of cooperative learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(78), 59–67.
Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193–215.
Piaget, J. (1975). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Penguin Book.
Pratt, S. (2003). Cooperative learning strategies. The Science Teacher, 70(4), 25.
Ratnawati, E. (2016). Karakteristik Teori-Teori Belajar dalam Proses Pendidikan (Perkembangan Psikologis dan Aplikasi). Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 4(2).
Scerri, E. R. (2003). Philosophical confusion in chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(5), 468.
Schneider, B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychologhy Theory and Practice (8th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education.
Suparno, P. (2001). Teori perkembangan kognitif jean piaget. Kanisius.
Thompson, M., McLaughlin, C. W., & Smith, R. G. (1995). Physical science (Wraparound). Ohio: Merrill.
Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting education research. United State of America: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th editi). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v2i1.28
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Marungkil Pasaribu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Belantika Pendidikan Jendela Pendidikan Indonesia Kayon Media
|
