Philosophical and Sociological Background of the Integration of Religion and Science

Nunung Masruroh, Amril M Amril M

Abstract


This research discusses the philosophical and sociological background behind the integration of religion and science, which have often been viewed as opposing entities. Using a literature review method, the study finds that this integration is driven by postmodernist thought as a response to the failure of modernism, which overly emphasizes positivism and empiricism. Philosophically, the integration is based on a holistic ontological view of reality, pluralistic epistemology, and axiology that promotes values beneficial for both worldly and spiritual life. Sociologically, it arises in response to modernization, secularization, a crisis of meaning, and society’s need for comprehensive education. In conclusion, the integration of religion and science is not merely an academic approach but a philosophical and social necessity for building an intellectually and spiritually balanced society.


Keywords


Religion and science integration; Postmodernist philosophy; Crisis of meaning Holistic approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. A., Richardo, R., Rochmadi, T., Wijaya, A., & Nurkhamid, N. (2022). The use of ethnomathematics learning media based on augmented reality for madrasah students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1140.

Alosaimi, N. R. O., Kadir, F. A. B. A., & Zaidan, A. M. (2024). The concept of values from a Quranic perspective. Quranica, 16(2 Suppl. 12), 546–578. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85217013614&partnerID=40&md5=c7db62c01aac1f2915c6f4c816d4728c.

Arizavi, S., Jalilifar, A., & Riazi, A. M. (2023). Analysis of argumentation in the discussion sections of published articles in ESP Journal: A diachronic corpus-based approach. Argumentation, 37(1), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09588-0.

Arizavi, S., Jalilifar, A., & Riazi, A. M. (2025). Argument schemes and soundness/strength in published research article discussion sections: A chronological study. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 14(1), 61–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.23004.ari.

Ascarya, A., & Tekdogan, O. F. (2021). Recommended methodology for research in Islamic economics and finance. In Teaching and research methods for Islamic economics and finance (pp. 282–302). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252764-22.

Azizah, R. L., & Roqib, M. (2024). Landasan filosofi studi integrasi Islam, sains, dan budaya Nusantara. Innovative: Journal of Social Science, 4, 998–1011. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/7702

Damper, R. I. (2024). Science and religion in conflict, part 2: Barbour’s four models revisited. Foundations of Science, 29(3), 703–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09871-z.

Dodevska, I. (2023). The genealogy of integrationism: Ideational foundations of the politics of immigrant integration. Frontiers in Political Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1125012.

Doucette, D. (2022). Measuring the impact of conceptual inquiry-based labs. In F. B., J. D., & R. Q. (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 151–156). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.Doucette.

Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163.

Feser, E. (2023). Truth as a transcendental. In International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées (Vol. 242, pp. 185–203). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15026-5_11.

George, K. M. (2023). Evolution of multi-disciplinary philosophies of method: Colonial antecedents and post-colonial paradigm shifts. In Multidisciplinary knowledge production and research methods in Sub-Saharan Africa: Language, literature and religion (pp. 201–221). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35531-8_13.

Hariono, T., & Chanifuddin, A. (2021). Monitoring automation system design hydroponics based on chatbot. Newton: Networking and Information Technology, 1(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.32764/newton.v1i2.1616.

Haryono, H., & Sunhaji, S. (2020). Peran orang tua untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar anak dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh (PJJ) di musim pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kependidikan, 8(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v8i2.4711.

Heritier, P. (2023). True God and true man: Some implications. Phenomenology and Mind, 2023(24), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2406.

Klaassen, R. G. (2021). Pedagogies of integration in challenge-based or interdisciplinary education. In H. Hüseyin-Ü., J. H.-M., M. A., & S. A. (Eds.), Proceedings - SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended learning in engineering education: Challenging, enlightening – and lasting? (pp. 287–296). SEFI. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122943677&partnerID=40&md5=f95df174c3c88eeed0c51bb825fd35fb.

Kovalenko, O., Koeberlein-Kerler, J., Briukhanova, N., Korolova, N., Bozhko, N., & Lytvyn, O. (2023). Preparation of students of engineering and pedagogical specialties for the development and implementation of interdisciplinary didactic projects using IT-technologies. In A. M. E., P. W., & R. T. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 634, pp. 301–309). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26190-9_31.

López-Estrada, P., & Elizondo-Mejías, J. (2024). Exploring beyond conventional boundaries: Body mapping as a data collection technique in qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.2.2024.e1010.

Mistiani, W., Istiyono, E., Syamsudin, A., & Ghazali, N. H. (2024). Developing a Pancasila students’ character instrument: Proof of construct validity and estimation of construct reliability. Research and Evaluation in Education, 10(2), 186–198.

Munajib, A. (2023). Environmental education values in the perspective of the Quran: A study of Maudui interpretation. In F. A., F. D. Y., & K. E. (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2805, Issue 1). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0149567.

Nicoli, B. (2024). Expanded view of ultimate questions in public science communication: Qualitative discourse analysis of genetics and neuroscience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 63(2), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12904.

Phoek, I., Bhaumik, A., Isaac, O., & Tjilen, A. (2024). How village funds influence economic development in South Papua, Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.26

Pradoko, S. (2019). Positive paradigm as a barrier to art creativity interpretation. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 19(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v19i2.20667.

Rediehs, L. (2022). The Quaker experiential integration of science and religion. Theology and Science, 20(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2022.2051247.

Scali, G. (2024). Qualitative study on public perception of the library: The Public Library of Empoli case. AIB Studi, 64(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-14025.

Soleh, A. K. (2023). Quantum integration model for religion and science. Afkar, 25(2), 257–290. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no2.8.

Zwart, H. (2022). Dialectics of technoscience. In Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (Vol. 38, pp. 17–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84570-4_2.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v8i1.428

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Nunung Masruroh, Amril M Amril M

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statistik BP

Belantika Pendidikan

Jendela Pendidikan Indonesia

Kayon Media

Lisensi Creative Commons

Belantika Pendidikan is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License