_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
_(Custom).png){kind=small}
Email this article Pengaruh Integrasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Learning Together dan Pemecahan Masalah Kimia dengan Teknik Pathway terhadap Pemahaman Konseptual dan Algoritmik Kimia
Abstract
The purposes of the study to examine the effect of implementation of instructional strategy through LT model of cooperative learning and through direct instruction to student’s conceptual and algorithmic understanding, The study used quasi experiment which was pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design was selected with two factor 2 x 2 version measurement technique. The results of the study were as follow: (1) there was no difference in the student’s conceptual understanding between group of student employed with LT model of cooperative learning strategy and group of student employed with direct instruction (F = 2,177, p = 0,142 > 0,05); (2) the difference in the student’s.
Penelitian bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh penerapan strategi pembelajaran yang dilakukan secara kooperatif model LT dan melalui pembelajaran langsung terhadap pemahaman konseptual dan algoritmik siswa, Penelitian menerapkan eksperimen semu (quasi experiment) di mana rancangan pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group digunakan dengan teknik pengukuran dua faktor versi 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) tidak ada perbedaan dalam pemahaman konseptual antara kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan menerapkan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif dan kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan menerapkan strategi pembelajaran langsung (F = 2,177, p = 0,142 > 0,05).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD.
Burron, B., James, M. L., & Ambrosio, A. L. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning in a physical science course for elementary/middle level preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 697–707.
Cardellini, L. (2006). Fostering creative problem solving in chemistry through group work. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 131–140.
Carpenter, S., & McMillan, T. (2003). Incorporation of a cooperative learning technique in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(3), 330.
Chiu, M. H. (2001). Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan. Proceedings-National Science Council Republic of China Part D Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 20–38.
Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang No 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Depdiknas. (2006a). Hasil Seleksi Ujian Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Tahun 2006.
Depdiknas. (2006b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta.
Depdiknas. (2007). Hasil Seleksi Ujian Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Tahun 2007.
Dinas Pendidikan Nasional Kota Mataram. (2007). Data Nilai Hasil Ujian Akhir SMA se-Kota Mataram.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovish, C. W., & Yekovish, F. R. (1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. Harper Collins College.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate date analysis with readings. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentce.
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636.
Hollingworth, R. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Developing science students’ metacognitive problem solving skills online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1).
Jacobs, G. M., Ball, J., & Gan, S. L. (1997). Learning cooperative learning via cooperative learning: A sourcebook of lesson plans for teacher education on cooperative learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Kean, E., & Middlecamp, C. (1994). How to survive (and even excel in) general chemistry. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Lonning, R. A. (1993). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th grade general science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1087–1101.
Lucks, R. (1999). Constructivist teaching vs direct instruction. P Ape R.
McCalla, J. (2003). Problem solving with pathways. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(1), 92.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Identifying conceptual students in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52.
Nakhleh, M. B., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference. ACS Publications.
Nurrenbern, S. C., & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508.
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2012). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Cengage Learning.
Pratt, S. (2003). Cooperative learning strategies. The Science Teacher, 70(4), 25.
Santoso, S. (2005). Menguasai statistik di era informasi dengan SPSS 12. Elex Media Komputindo.
Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational Technology: Theory and Practice (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stamovlasis, D., Tsaparlis, G., Kamilatos, C., Papaoikonomou, D., & Zarotiadou, E. (2005). Conceptual understanding versus algorithmic problem solving: Further evidence from a national chemistry examination. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(2), 104–118.
Sudyana, I. N. (2006). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Melalui Seting Belajar Kooperatif Terhadap Pemahaman Konseptual dan Algoritmik Kimia Siswa Kelas 2 Sekolah Menengah Atas. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Wagner, E. P. (2001). A study comparing the efficacy of a mole ratio flow chart to dimensional analysis for teaching reaction stoichiometry. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 10–22.
Williamson, V. M., & Rowe, M. W. (2002). Group problem-solving versus lecture in college-level quantitative analysis: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(9), 1131.
Wood, C. (2006). The development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96–113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v2i1.29
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Muntari Muntari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Belantika Pendidikan Jendela Pendidikan Indonesia Kayon Media
|
