Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Kelas XII SMKN 3 Pontianak

Bayu Fitra Prisuna, Saumi Setyaningrum

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to analyze the quality of the Even Semester Final Examination questions for Islamic Religious Education and Character Building subjects for class XII Accounting at SMKN 3 Pontianak based on validity, reliability, difficulty level, discriminating power, and distractor effectiveness. The study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive design. Data in the form of 40 multiple-choice questions and answer sheets from 49 students were analyzed using Anates version 4.0.9. The results showed that the quality of the instrument did not fully meet the criteria for a good test. Only 15% of the items were categorized as good, while most still needed revision. This finding demonstrates the importance of periodic item analysis to improve the quality of learning evaluation instruments.


Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualitas butir soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Genap mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti kelas XII Akuntansi SMKN 3 Pontianak berdasarkan validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan efektivitas pengecoh. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Data berupa 40 soal pilihan ganda dan lembar jawaban 49 peserta didik dianalisis menggunakan Anates versi 4.0.9. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kualitas instrumen belum sepenuhnya memenuhi kriteria tes yang baik. Hanya 15% butir soal berkategori baik, sedangkan sebagian besar masih memerlukan revisi. Temuan ini menunjukkan pentingnya analisis butir soal secara berkala untuk meningkatkan kualitas instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran.

Keywords


item analysis; test quality; difficulty level; discriminating power; distractor effectiveness; learning evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asrulla, Risnita, Jailani, M. S., & Jeka, F. (2023). Populasi dan Sampling ( Kuantitatif ), Serta Pemilihan Informan Kunci (Kualitatif) dalam Pendekatan Praktis. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 26320–26332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.10836

Fitriyah, I. M., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Analysis of the distractor of the multiple-choice test using classical test theory ( CTT ) and item response theory ( IRT ). Materials of International Practical Internet Conference “Challenges of Science,” Vi. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31643/2023.23

Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2021). Using full-information item analysis to improve item quality. Educational Assessment, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1946390

Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet, J. (2022). Evaluating Student Evaluations of Teaching : a Review of Measurement and Equity Bias in SETs and Recommendations for Ethical Reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w

Lions, S., Monsalve, C., Dartnell, P., Godoy, M. I., & Córdova, N. (2021). The Position of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Test Items : The Strongest Precede the Weakest. Front. Educ., 6(October), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.731763

Mannan, A., & Kusaeri, S. (2025). Practices and Challenges of the Validity of Exploratory Factor Analysis ( EFA ) -Based Assessment Instruments : A Systematic Literature Review 2020-2025. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1463

Nurhalimah, S., Hidayati, Y., Rosidi, I., & Hadi, W. P. (2022). Hubungan Antara Validitas Item dengan Daya Pembeda dan Tingkat Kesukaran Soal Pilihan Ganda PAS. Jurnal Natural Science Educational Research, 4(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i3.8682

Pradani, R. A., & Efendi, A. (2023). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Menggunakan Program Iteman ( Analysis of School Exam Questions Using the Iteman Program ). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 8(2), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v8i2.11002

Prisuna, B. F. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Aplikasi Google Meet terhadap Hasil Belajar The Effect of Using Google Meet Applications on Learning Outcomes. 14(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.39160

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. CV Pustaka Setia.

Rezigalla, A. A., Mohammed, A., Seid, E., Eleragi, A., Elhussein, A. B., Alfaifi, J., Alghamdi, M. A., Ameer, A. Y. Al, Ibrahim, A., Yahia, O., Mohammed, O. A., Ishag, M., & Adam, E. (2024). Item analysis : the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05433-y

Saptaputra, I., Marwiyah, S., & Hasanuddin, M. I. (2023). Analysis of the Items Final Semester Test of Islamic Religious Education. IQRO: Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.24256/iqro.v6i1.2391

Savika, H. I., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2024). Peran analisis butir soal terhadap kualitas soal, kompetensi guru, dan prestasi belajar peserta didik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 2(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v2i2.856

Shafara, N. I., Ihsanudin, & Rafianti, I. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Matematis Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Jurnal Educatio, 10(2), 614–622. https://doi.org/DOI : https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i2.8840

Zahner, D., Steedle, J. T., Soland, J., Welch, C., Qin, Q., Thompson, K., & Phelps, R. (2025). Results from NCME Survey on Revisions to the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. In EdWorkingPaper: 25 -1124 (Issue 25). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26300/7zzf-9193




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v8i2.455

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bayu Fitra Prisuna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statistik BP

Belantika Pendidikan

Jendela Pendidikan Indonesia

Kayon Media

Lisensi Creative Commons

Belantika Pendidikan is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License